Share Button

Timing of UCAN payment questioned -- Consumer group and CPUC deny any connection to San Onofre matter

Union Tribune (11 Jul 2014) Jeff Mc Donald

This Page: http://www.copswiki.org/Common/M1462
Media Link: http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/jul/11/ucan-opinion-piece-san-onofre-settlement/all/?print
More Info: Shut San Onofre, Stop The Unfair Settlement

Timing of UCAN payment questioned

Consumer group and CPUC deny any connection to San Onofre matter

By Jeff McDonald7:36 p.m.July 11, 2014

A surfer rides a wave in front of the San Onofre nuclear power plant Friday, June 7, 2013, in San Onofre, Calif. (AP Photo/Gregory Bull)

A surfer rides a wave in front of the San Onofre nuclear power plant Friday, June 7, 2013, in San Onofre, Calif. (AP Photo/Gregory Bull) — AP

In mid-May, when U-T Watchdog reported that several community groups were questioning a ratepayer settlement for closure costs of the San Onofre power plant, one local group was silent.

Utility Consumers’ Action Network executive director Donald Kelly said he did not support or oppose the plan because he had not researched it.

The next week, Kelly wrote an opinion pieceannouncing his support for the plan. In late June, the California Public Utilities Commission awarded UCAN $17,000 for work on an unrelated case.

One critic of the proposed settlement, which calls for consumers to pay more than $3 billion toward the cost of shuttering the plant, worries that the payment was untoward.

“This is another illustration of how intervenor compensation is used to beat ratepayer advocates into submission,” said Michael Aguirre, the former San Diego city attorney who is fighting the plan. “It shows how the president of the PUC can wield the intervenor compensation even in unrelated matters.”

Kelly said there was no connection between his endorsement of the San Onofre cost-sharing proposal and his award from regulators.

“I wrote the op-ed because I believe the settlement is worth approving,” Kelly said. “I interviewed parties on both sides of the issue. After further review, I made a decision to support the settlement.”

A commission spokesman also said Friday that there was no nexis between the award to UCAN and Kelly’s support of the San Onofre plan.

The intervenor compensation program pays advocates, lawyers and other groups that contribute to decision-making by utility regulators out of funds charged to regulated utilities.

For decades, UCAN and other groups have sought and received millions of dollars from the utilities commission to help support their advocacy work.

© Copyright 2014 The San Diego Union-Tribune, LLC. An MLIM LLC Company. All rights reserved.

Comments

Media Form edit

Title Timing of UCAN payment questioned -- Consumer group and CPUC deny any connection to San Onofre matter
Publisher Union Tribune
Author Jeff Mc Donald
Pub Date 11 Jul 2014
Media Link http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/jul/11/ucan-opinion-piece-san-onofre-settlement/all/?print
Embed HTML
Forum Link
Note
Keywords Shut San Onofre, Stop The Unfair Settlement
Media Type Linked Article
Media Group News
Curator Rating Plain
Book ISBN
Author Name Sortable
Thumbnail Link
Topic revision: r2 - 2016-05-16, UnknownUser
 

This site is powered by FoswikiCopyright © by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding Copswiki? Send feedback